Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures in Latin America: A survey describing current practices.

OBJECTIVE: Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) are one of the most common differential diagnoses of epilepsy. This study provides an overview of diagnostic and treatment services for patients with PNES across Latin America. METHODS: In 2017-2018, clinicians practicing in Latin America with responsibilities for patients with PNES were contacted to respond to a survey regarding the management of this disorder developed by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) PNES Task Force. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty responses from 17 Latin American countries were analyzed. Most respondents were neurologists (81%) under 40 years of age (61%). Fifty-seven percent of professionals stated that they personally diagnose PNES, but only 33% stated that they provide follow-up, and only 20% that they recommend treatment. Many participants (54%) characterized themselves as either unfamiliar with the diagnosis or inexperienced in arranging treatment. Most respondents reported having access to brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 88%) and routine electroencephalogram (EEG; 71%), 64% have the access to video-EEG longer than 8 h, and 54% of professionals performed video-EEG to confirm PNES diagnoses. Although cognitive-behavioral therapy was recognized as the treatment of choice (by 82% of respondents), there was little access to it (60%). In contrast, a high proportion of respondents reported using antidepressant (67%), antiseizure (57%), and antipsychotic medications (54%) as treatments for PNES. SIGNIFICANCE: This study reveals several deficiencies in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with PNES in Latin America. The barriers are reinforced by lack of knowledge among the specialists and poor healthcare system support. There is inadequate access to prolonged video-EEG and psychotherapy. An inappropriate use of antiseizure medicines seems commonplace, and there are low follow-up rates by neurologists after the diagnosis. Multidisciplinary guidelines are required to improve the approach of patients with PNES.

Long-term disability in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with a history of myelitis is associated with age at onset, delay in diagnosis/preventive treatment, MRI lesion length and presence of symptomatic brain lesions.

BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system (CNS) that preferentially targets the spinal cord and optic nerves. Increasing disability is accrued with each inflammatory attack. Disability has been shown to be an independent predictor of poor quality of life in those with NMOSD. Factors associated with increasing disability need further systematic investigation. METHODS: We performed a multi-center retrospective chart analysis of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) seropositive NMOSD patients with a history of myelitis seen at five large referral centers for patients with NMOSD worldwide for whom thorough records including relapse history and corresponding imaging were available. Potential contributors to long-term disability were extracted including demographics, radiographic findings, and clinical characteristics. Multivariable regression modeling was conducted to determine correlates of disability in patients with NMOSD, as measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). RESULTS: One hundred eighty-two AQP4 seropositive patients (88% female) were included in this analysis. Multiple regression modeling revealed that older age at disease onset, delay in diagnosis/preventive treatment, length of longest acute myelitis lesion and presence of symptomatic brain/brainstem lesions were associated with increased disability when holding other variables constant. CONCLUSION: While age at onset is a factor that cannot be controlled in NMOSD, we can reduce the delay in diagnosis/preventive treatment and reduce future relapses in the brain/brainstem and spinal cord. Delay in diagnosis/preventive treatment and imaging variables that contributed to increased disability support the need for improved measures for early, accurate diagnosis and management of NMOSD, and aggressive treatment of acute relapses.

Percepciones y actitudes de los pacientes frente a la cirugía de la epilepsia: conceptos equivocados en Colombia / Patients' perceptions of and attitudes towards epilepsy surgery: mistaken concepts in Colombia

Introducción. Los pacientes con epilepsia focal farmacorresistente se podrían beneficiar de la cirugía de la epilepsia; sin embargo, existen demoras en la realización del procedimiento. El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el conocimiento y las actitudes de los pacientes hacia la cirugía de epilepsia e identificar barreras que pudieran retrasar el tratamiento. Pacientes y métodos. Se aplicó un cuestionario de 10 minutos a pacientes con epilepsia en Colombia. La encuesta evaluó el conocimiento de la opción quirúrgica, las percepciones sobre el riesgo de la cirugía frente al riesgo de crisis no controladas, la discapacidad producida por la enfermedad, las metas del tratamiento y las variables demográficas y socioeconómicas. Resultados. Se seleccionaron 88 pacientes con epilepsia focal. El 56% de los pacientes no sabía que la cirugía podría ser una opción terapéutica. El 60% consideró que la cirugía de la epilepsia es muy o moderadamente peligrosa. Una gran proporción pensaba que la muerte (41%), el ictus (47%), la pérdida visual (56%), los cambios en la personalidad (56%), la parálisis (61%), las dificultades para hablar (69%) y la pérdida de la memoria (60%) eran efectos secundarios comunes. La mayoría (62%) consideraba el procedimiento como la última opción de tratamiento. Conclusiones. Existe una actitud negativa por parte de los pacientes frente a la cirugía de la epilepsia fundamentada en la sobreestimación del riesgo de adquirir déficits neurológicos secundarios al procedimiento, lo que refleja la falta de conocimiento hacia este tratamiento. Estas percepciones erróneas pueden contribuir a demoras en la atención quirúrgica

Introduction. Selected patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy benefit from epilepsy surgery, however significant delays remain. The aim of this study was to assess knowledge and attitudes toward epilepsy surgery among patients with epilepsy and identify barriers that might delay the treatment. Patients and methods. A 10-minute questionnaire was administered to patients with epilepsy in Colombia. Survey assessed the following: knowledge of surgical options, perceptions about the risks of surgery vs. ongoing seizures, disease disability, treatment goals, and demographic and socioeconomic variables. Results. We recruited 88 patients with focal epilepsy. More than half of patients (56%) were not aware that surgery might be an option. Apprehension about epilepsy surgery was evident, 60% of patients perceived epilepsy surgery to be very or moderately dangerous. A large proportion of patients believe death (41%), stroke (47%), vision loss (56%), personality change (56%), paralysis (62%), difficulties in speaking (69%), and memory loss (60%) were frequent side effects. The majority of patients (62%) consider the surgical procedure as the last option of treatment. Conclusions. There is a negative attitude toward epilepsy surgery based on the patients' misperceptions of suffering neurological deficits during the surgery, reflecting lack of knowledge toward this type of treatment. These perceptions can contribute to delays in surgical care

Guillain-Barré Syndrome Associated with Zika Virus Infection in Colombia.

BACKGROUND: Zika virus (ZIKV) infection has been linked to the Guillain-Barré syndrome. From November 2015 through March 2016, clusters of cases of the Guillain-Barré syndrome were observed during the outbreak of ZIKV infection in Colombia. We characterized the clinical features of cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome in the context of this ZIKV infection outbreak and investigated their relationship with ZIKV infection. METHODS: A total of 68 patients with the Guillain-Barré syndrome at six Colombian hospitals were evaluated clinically, and virologic studies were completed for 42 of the patients. We performed reverse-transcriptase-polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assays for ZIKV in blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and urine, as well as antiflavivirus antibody assays. RESULTS: A total of 66 patients (97%) had symptoms compatible with ZIKV infection before the onset of the Guillain-Barré syndrome. The median period between the onset of symptoms of ZIKV infection and symptoms of the Guillain-Barré syndrome was 7 days (interquartile range, 3 to 10). Among the 68 patients with the Guillain-Barré syndrome, 50% were found to have bilateral facial paralysis on examination. Among 46 patients in whom nerve-conduction studies and electromyography were performed, the results in 36 patients (78%) were consistent with the acute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy subtype of the Guillain-Barré syndrome. Among the 42 patients who had samples tested for ZIKV by RT-PCR, the results were positive in 17 patients (40%). Most of the positive RT-PCR results were in urine samples (in 16 of the 17 patients with positive RT-PCR results), although 3 samples of cerebrospinal fluid were also positive. In 18 of 42 patients (43%) with the Guillain-Barré syndrome who underwent laboratory testing, the presence of ZIKV infection was supported by clinical and immunologic findings. In 20 of these 42 patients (48%), the Guillain-Barré syndrome had a parainfectious onset. All patients tested were negative for dengue virus infection as assessed by RT-PCR. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of ZIKV infection documented by RT-PCR among patients with the Guillain-Barré syndrome during the outbreak of ZIKV infection in Colombia lends support to the role of the infection in the development of the Guillain-Barré syndrome. (Funded by the Bart McLean Fund for Neuroimmunology Research and others.).